|
|
| |
More
NurseWeek Features |
|
|
Smoke-Free Zone |
|
| |
Nurses and patients tackle nicotine addiction
|
|
 |
Bloodless Survival |
|
| |
Surgical techniques to use when transfusion drops out of the equation |
|
|
|
|
At a time when U.S. health care
facilities are recruiting in Canada because
of the nursing shortage, it’s hard
to understand the timing of a rule that
might slow down foreign nurse recruitment
or discourage Canadian nurses from coming
here or staying.
|
|
Every day, some 500 of 2,500 nurses at the Henry Ford
Health System, Detroit, cross the Canadian border to
work. A new ruling by the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) that requires visa certification for foreign nurses
who work in the U.S. may change this for Henry Ford
and other border facilities. Is the new ruling a hardship
for foreign nurses, a serious patient safety concern,
or a measure of patient protection?
As the transition period for this new ruling comes
to an end, discussions about its merits and drawbacks
are heating up.
The new view
“The law isn’t new,” says Phyllis
Kritek, RN, PhD, FAAN, immediate past-president of the
Board of Trustees of the Commission on Graduates of
Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS). Kritek says that the
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility
Act (IIRIRA), aimed at controlling illegal immigration,
dates back to 1996. What’s new is the final ruling
that DHS made last year regarding how to carry out the
IIRIRA.
Under the new rule, nonimmigrant nurses who enter the
U.S. after the date of the ruling, July 26, 2003, but
before July 26, 2004, would have a year from entry to
produce a visa certificate from a DHS-approved agency,
such as CGFNS. Nurses already here before the ruling
date would have until July 26, 2004, to produce the
certificate. After that, whenever nurses ask for an
extension or leave and want to return to the U.S., they
must have a certificate in hand. Previously under the
Trade NAFTA, nonimmigrant nurses from Canada or Mexico
who worked in the U.S. were exempt from visa certification.
Border sites
Canadian nurse Joyce Farrer, RN, MSN, ED, director
at Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, sees the new ruling
as a hardship, voicing what many of her Canadian staff
nurses ask: “Why go through the process especially
after working in the states for years?”
“VisaScreen, the program that CGFNS initiated
after IIRIRA was passed in 1996, is a long, often frustrating
process,” says Farrer (see sidebar for more information).
At a time when U.S. health care facilities are recruiting
in Canada because of the nursing shortage, it’s
hard to understand the timing of a rule that might slow
down foreign nurse recruitment or discourage Canadian
nurses from coming here or staying.
“The new ruling doesn’t take into consideration
the effect on the border states,” says Maureen
Henson, SPHR, Henry Ford director of recruitment strategies.
Henson believes that Canadian nurses who currently fortify
border health care facilities, many of whom have worked
in the U.S. for years, are caught short. “Hardest
hit will be cities like Detroit, Buffalo, and Seattle,”
she says.
Colleagues at facilities in southeastern Michigan are
trying to assess the possible impact of the new ruling.
At Henry Ford, where about 20% of nurses are Canadian,
Henson estimates that the greatest impact would be in
the ED, ICU, and OR. “Though confident that we
would not close areas, we might have to redeploy staffing,”
she says.
Heading off workforce woes
Hoping to leverage influence over the issue, Henry
Ford and area colleagues mustered political support
by writing to Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and U.S.
senators. They and nursing groups wrote to Secretary
of Homeland Security Tom Ridge requesting an extension
of the July deadline.
On behalf of the National Council of the State Boards
of Nursing (NCSBN) president Donna Dorsey, RN, MS, FAAN,
told Ridge that “10,000 to 15,000 nurses who have
been licensed and practicing in the U.S. since 1997
will be unable to provide health care because of the
retroactive implementation of the rule.”
Dorsey added, “This is a serious patient safety
concern for our citizens based on the evidence of medical
errors related to short staffing.”
|